![]() ![]() IMHO the decision to label 3.x stable and push users into upgrading was rushed and flawed, and led to the point where insync is today. But judging by the several reports here on the forums, 3.x is still very far from being reliable and barely usable. ![]() Thank God I never made the jump to 3.x, I am still relying on 1.5 on Fedora, and it has been working just fine. It’s sad to see how things went downhill with 3.x, specially when 1.5 was (is) very decent and usable. ![]() I would like to hear from other customers on what they think about this and what alternatives they have come up with. For me, important features include selective sync, multi-device sync, reliability Google Drive sync, and esp keeping my very large Lightroom pic and video libraries synced in the cloud. Ove the last year or so, I’ve experienced too many issues and my confidence in Insync’s reliability has severely eroded.Īs a long-time Insync customer (5 years+), I am now looking for alternatives. This seems to be an endemic issue that may have to do with a seriously compromised codebase, refactoring, misguided priorities on pushing new features over resolving serious bugs, or perhaps just a subpar product team. I have been building sophisticated SaaS applications for a long time now. Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be any real improvement. I was hoping the long-delayed update to 64-bit, v3+ Mac app would have sorted some of the major issues around sync errors, DB corruption would have been resolved. As many posts here show, Insync has been bug-ridden for too long now. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |